![]() Pro-life policies are required at state and federal levels - including, the authors urge, a new amendment to protect unborn children under the Fourteenth Amendment. All of the medical, legal and political infrastructure upholding the abortion regime must be dramatically rehabilitated. Overturning Roe, then, is only the beginning. “The only proper response to the past five decades of destruction is to dismantle every part of the system that perpetuates abortion,” they write. Anderson and DeSanctis are right to say it harms everything. Our medical system, law, politics and culture have all been compromised by its lies. Journalists have given up even pretending to be unbiased purveyors of the news when it comes to abortion.Ĭhildren, mothers, families, racial minorities and the disabled have suffered under fifty years of Roe. Corporate legacy media, the entertainment industry and woke capitalists unrepentantly carry water for the Pro-Abortion cause, perpetuating falsehoods about abortion and the pro-life cause. There is only one pro-life Democrat sitting (precariously) in the House of Representatives.įinally, there’s the cultural impact. Pennsylvania Governor Robert Casey was prohibited from speaking at the 1992 Democratic National Convention. One political party - historically on the side of the vulnerable and disenfranchised - has become so beholden to an absolutist Pro-Abortion ideology that it wants to permit abortions even under the most horrific of circumstances. Alabama? Do they know how many times the Supreme Court has overturned a previous ruling? More than 300.Ībortion has also poisoned our politics. Before and after its overturning, the left made countless references to stare decisis, though their appeals to that concept are so ad hoc as to be laughable. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg acknowledged that the legal reasoning behind Roe was seriously flawed. The abortion regime has also confused our legal landscape. Organizations like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists act as “transparently political abortion advocacy group.” “Do no harm,” the most fundamental principle of the Hippocratic Oath, is violated during an abortion. Then there’s the effect of abortion on our medical system, facilitating a paradigm in which medical providers lie to the public about the biological realities of human life inside the womb. The brain begins to form as early as the fifth week (which is before many women even realize they are pregnant) a heartbeat can be detected at six weeks the sex of the baby can be discerned at ten weeks and the child in the womb can suck its thumb at eighteen weeks. Moreover, much of that development happens quite early. It may not have all the same qualities as a baby at the moment of birth, but it is a human developing them. Even at the very beginning, when that new organism is a one-celled zygote, it is an organism of the human species. The moment a sperm fertilizes an egg, a new organism comes into existence, and that organism is always a human one. Of course, abortion harms an unborn human child. A post-mortem is in order, as is a quo vadis reflection: where does the pro-life movement go now? ![]() We won, didn’t we? Why rehash all the arguments against abortion in light of victory? Yet such thinking fails to understand how terribly toxic fifty years of an American abortion regime has really been. Perhaps some might counter that now that the abortion movement has suffered such a blow, Tearing Us Apart is actually poorly timed. ![]() Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision. Anderson and Alexandra DeSanctis, “we will all know how the Court has ruled.” And they were right, just barely: I began reading Tearing Us Apart: How Abortion Harms Everything and Solves Nothing the day after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. “By the time this book is in your hands,” write authors Ryan T.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |